Progress on Phoenix Activity

Articles, Restructuring + Insolvency

A recent decision of the Federal Court of Australia, ACN 093 117 232 Pty Ltd (in liq) V Intelara Engineering Consultants Pty Ltd (in liq) [2019] FCA 1489, will give cause for thought to those involved in the “restructuring” industry.

The Court considered a circumstance in which the consideration paid for the transfer of a business and assets was the assumption of employee liabilities owed by the seller.

It has long been considered that the assumption of such liabilities can constitute payment if not in whole at least in part, of the purchase price for assets transferred. In simple terms the assumption of the liability can be thought of as improving the balance sheet of the selling company by ensuring, at least in theory, that the buyer is responsible for meeting employee entitlements which would otherwise constitute a priority liability in a winding up.

In Interlara, Justice Derrington looked at the circumstances behind the transfer in detail and took into account that what had really occurred was simply a reordering of priorities to ensure that the Company’s secured creditor was able to be paid out of assets which may otherwise have been subject to the priority claims of employees. This occurred in circumstances where those liabilities had been guaranteed by the company’s director.

His Honour noted that in these circumstances the person truly benefiting from the transaction was the Company’s director who had paid no consideration for that benefit. His Honour held that there was no real benefit to the Company in entering into the transaction and that the assets were transferred for what was “effectively a nil consideration”.

there was no real benefit to the Company in entering into the transaction and that the assets were transferred for what was “effectively a nil consideration”

Reading between the lines the case seems to be one in which the liquidator again benefited from the involvement of FEG. It seems from the judgment that FEG was called upon to meet unpaid employee entitlements in this instance and based on our experience we suspect FEG funded the liquidator to take these proceedings.

If our suspicion is right FEG is to be applauded for again being active in its continuing attacks on those involved in Phoenix activity. We have little doubt that FEG’s involvement and willingness to fund such matters will in the long run have a significant impact on the pre-insolvency industry and for one we applaud the Department in these initiatives and its ongoing efforts.

The case is of interest as the use of employee entitlements to pay what has been considered value for the transfer of assets is a common feature in the Phoenix industries. This decision suggest the Courts may be looking at this area anew and prepared to look beyond the surface at the substance of such transactions.

If followed the approach will represent a very real and significant attack on those involved in the Phoenix Industry.


If you have any questions about this article, please get in touch online (below).


With the technical skills, diverse backgrounds and practical experience to match, our teams care about their clients.

Our Expertise

We have a strong reputation for providing specialist, market-leading advice in the practices we offer. Our teams are experts in their field and provide an unrivalled service to clients.


We want to share our knowledge with you. A collection of news and insights into those areas in which we specialise.


We offer a relevant, easy access platform that allows clients and colleagues to gain access to relevant resources.

Contact Us

With offices in Sydney and Melbourne, our team pride themselves on always being available for their clients.


We are collaborative, respectful and inclusive. Recruiting the best talent is only half of the equation; providing a culture that enables development is the other.

See our exciting opportunities available for graduates, lawyers, legal support staff and business services professionals.